The Great Ideologies: The Left

Communism During the Cold War

Martin Luther created the womb out of which was ultimately born “the Left” and so his philosophy of the conflict between Faith and Reason must be noted.

The Catholic faith had always believed in a profound dialogue between Faith and Reason.  From Augustine’s “baptism” of Plato to Aquinas’ “baptism” of Aristotle, all of Catholic thought revolved around the idea that Reason was as helpless as a rudderless ship in the midst of a terrible storm without the axioms of Faith whereas Faith without Reason was like a blind man stumbling through the dark void of his life to an unknown end.

Martin Luther, however, famously disagreed and declared a war of Faith against Reason: “Reason is the Devil’s greatest Whore; by nature and manner of being she is a noxious whore; she is a prostitute, the Devil’s appointed whore; whore eaten by scab and leprosy who ought to be trodden under foot and destroyed, she and her wisdom … Throw dung in her face to make her ugly. She is and she ought to be drowned in baptism… She would deserve, the wretch, to be banished to the filthiest place in the house, to the closets.”

He believed that, “To be a Christian, you must pluck out the eye of reason.”

He also had a number of new ideas about morality: “God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong (sin boldly), but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world.”

He also believed “Sin cannot tear you away from [Christ], even though you commit adultery a hundred times a day and commit as many murders.”

Martin Luther advocated a licentiousness completely at odds with any concept of the Natural Order combined with a war leveled by Faith against Reason.

When Protestantism defeated and ended Christendom in the Thirty Years War (with aid from the betrayal of Christendom by France), it became the dominant ideology by the might of its sword.  All Europe became infused with the idea that Faith was routing Reason.

During the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror, Reason fought back.  The Cult of Reason — the first-ever state religion of atheism — was established.  The idea emerged that the Natural Order was being imposed on everyone by Crown and Crosier politics in order to prevent mankind from reaching the utopia of rational, radical freedom.  The dominant political, religious, or social institutions that justified their existence by claiming to be part of the Natural Order — the Monarchy, the Catholic Church, and the conjugal family — were targeted for extinction.  Luther’s idea of license was eagerly adopted but his Faith and his war on Reason were jettisoned.  Mankind would free itself from bondage once and for all.

Unfortunately for the theoretical utopia, the Cult of Reason proved to be too bloodthirsty of a religion (judging by the busyness of the guillotine).  By the time of Napoleon, Europe had concluded that the unwashed masses needed some sort of faith.  The Catholic Church & Protestant Churches respectively became state religions.  It was seen as a subset of rational policy to promote faith-based virtues in the populace while the elites — more educated and more secular — went about the real business of governing Europe.  Much of elite policy-making was targeted towards a gradual and orderly decline in Christianity (because of its irrationality) while promoting non-faith based virtues in its place.

The Left has had a torturous historical trajectory.  It reincarnated itself in its most radical form (straight out of the Reign of Terror playbook) with atheist Communism.  Communism preached about its own inevitability and expanded steadily across the globe.  However, the collaboration across cultural, military, economic, and political strategies between Ronald Reagan in Washington, Margaret Thatcher in London, and John Paul the Great in Rome finally brought the USSR to its knees.  The Berlin Wall fell in 1989 and the rest is history.

Or is it?

China has abandoned its commitment to full-fledged Communism — finally allowing businesses to be founded again — but it has not given up its One-Child Policy or its attempt to persecute or control the Catholic Church and other Christian faiths.  It still seeks to control family and religion for itself.  China is strong and growing stronger and must be taken seriously as a rival power.  However, China is ultimately going to be faced with an enormous aging problem that makes it less of a threat than it seems.

A far greater threat is internal.  In the 1920s, Margaret Sanger and John Dewey brought the Left right into American politics.  She focused on attacking the Roman Catholic Church.  A great article on her strategy is here.  He busied himself with a “progressive” takeover of the public schools.  Their work did not come to full fruition until the Sexual Revolution in the 1960s finally introduced the Left into the mainstream of the United States.

Posted in The Left | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Great Ideologies: Islamism

Countries with Sharia Law

There are three great modern ideologies of governance.  In a series of posts, I shall examine each one.  At the end, I will assess their historical trajectory.

These three ideologies that lay claim to understand the path to justice in this world.  They are Islamism (originating with the Prophet Muhammed himself), the Left (originating with the left side of the Parliament in the French Revolution), and Social Conservatism (originating with the Declaration of Independence).

Islamism is the oldest and most self-explanatory.  It is the political-religious ideology that Islam can and must conquer the world in a grand quest to subject any and all people to the Caliphate.  In this construct, religion militarily controls the state.  Natural law is the basis for all governance.  No provision is given for natural rights (particularly women’s rights) — allowing unlimited trampling of human subjects on the path to world domination.  Its greatest weakness and its greatest strength are one and the same: coercion.  It is coercive  within the family structure (towards the woman), coercive to the citizens of Islamic states (apostacy is punishable by death), and coercive in its attempt to conquer its external enemies (Israeli Jews, Indian Hindus, or African Christians).

Centralizing power in the hands of Islamist men gives those men great strength.  They have great power to intimidate, control policy on a micro (family) and macro (government) level, and rally like-minded allies around opposition to the Infidel.  However, they are badly outnumbered — by non-Islamist Islamic men, by women, by non-Islamic citizens, and by their external enemies.  This makes their regime strong but precarious — where the Islamists can be suddenly badly outnumbered in the event of a revolution.

Islamism has spent its entire history waging warfare to achieve its ends.  It began in Saudi Arabia, and expanded, conquering and subjecting the Persians in Iran, the Jews in Palestine, the Arians in North Africa, the Christians in Spain, the Catholic Crusaders in Palestine, the Greek Orthodox in the Byzantine Empire, the Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh, the Christians in Somalia, Sudan, and the Sierra Leone.  Currently, a handful of implacable foes resist their advances.  Niger, Chad, Ethiopia, and Kenya have resisted their southern advances into Africa.  Israel has withstood their attempts to subjugate the entire middle east.  India has withstood centuries of Islamist ambition.  Charles Martel, Godfrey of Bouillon, Charles V, Don John of Austria, and John Sobieski demonstrated great courage in the face of overwhelming odds to stop the rising tide of Islamism at critical points.  More like them will continue to have to demonstrate that courage.

Islamism is an ongoing menace to the free world that must be taken seriously and contained.  However, it is not as strong as the map makes it look.  Current rebellions throughout the Middle East are overthrowing sharia-based countries like Egypt, Yemen, Libya, and Tunisia where the anti-coercive power of the populace is being unleashed.  Islamic unity has been an ongoing problem since Lawrence of Arabia helped shatter the Ottoman Empire in the First World War.  Sunnis and Shiites can only agree that the enemies of Islam must be overcome.  But the three great leaders of Islamism — Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Libya — do not trust each other one bit.

Islamism is powerful and dangerous.  But its power is waning and is not as great as fear makes it.  Christianity (particularly Catholicism) is gaining ground in Africa through non-coercive means much faster than Islamism is winning Africa by the sword.  India is strengthening at the expense of Pakistan.  Israel is very threatened but the puppeteer of the anti-Israel groups (Iran) is facing increasing unrest from its citizens.

Since the decline and fall of the Ottoman Empire, the expansion of Islamism has remained a serious threat to liberty but is undergoing a mostly-illusory expansion that is continuing in the twilight of the movement’s strength.  A much more dangerous ongoing threat to the world is the Left, the origins and trajectory of which I will examine in my next post.

Posted in Islamism | Tagged | Leave a comment

In Defense of American Public Schools

One of the favorite things that United States citizens like to complain about is American public schools.  John Dewey poisoned our public school systems in many ways (a whole different issue).  However, what really goes too far is when we compare ourselves unfavorably with foreign nations like Japan, Korea, Finland, and  Germany.

Japanese, Korean, Finnish, and German students typically score significantly higher on their TIMSS and PISA tests in math, science, and reading.  This will lead to politicians frequently complaining that we are “falling behind” in the “global economy.”

This alleged weakness on the part of our public schools typically is used to justify aggressive federal intervention in education (yes, I am looking at you, George W. Bush and Barack Obama).  Typically these interventions centralize power, violate the 10th Amendment, and disregard the Catholic social teaching on subsidiarity.

However, it is obvious that this alarmist view of a United States education is based on flawed assumptions.  The countries that outperform us funnel a large amount of their low-performing students (in Germany, for example, it is 2/3 of the students) into “vocational education” programs.  These people are trained in a more menial skill (like mechanics) so that they can provide low-level work to the economy in an efficient manner.

The only people that take the TIMSS test in these countries are people who the government deems ready for specialized work in math and science.  Thus, the American students (all of them) are being matched against the best math and science students in the other respective countries.  And, in light of this fact, many researchers believe that the American students do the best job in the world.

At the heart of the issue is a disagreement about the nature of education.  Vocational educational philosophy looks on a student as an investment by the economy for the economy.  They would not want to over-invest in the wrong students.  Thus, the governments design systems where they can weed out students unworthy of a liberal arts education.

American educational philosophy believes that it has a duty to arm each student with a liberal arts education that will serve them wherever their career and life lead them.  All students learn Science, Literature, History, Math, and Politics.  Americans believe that no student is unworthy of investment because every student will ultimately be the citizens leading this great nation.  If that results in too many bus drivers having insight into Shakespeare then so be it.  It is worth the cost to allow the bus driver to have the insight to govern this country and follow whatever career opportunities become available to him.

American public schooling has serious problems.  But matched up against our more elitist educational competitors bent on micromanagement and denial of liberal arts education, give me an American public school education every time.

Posted in American Public Schools, Germany, Japan, liberal arts education, Vocational Education | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment